<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cleverfoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ophion.org/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ophion.org</link>
	<description>Rafael Ferreira&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So this is what intelligent pragmatism looks like&#8230; by willyburger</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/12/so-this-is-what-intelligent-pragmatism-looks-like/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>willyburger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org:81/blog/?p=27#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Still got your head in the sand on this one?  Getting itchy?  :^)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still got your head in the sand on this one?  Getting itchy?  :^)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux by Links 15/07/2009: GNU/Linux Servers Top Survey, Linux Boots in 1 Second &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 15/07/2009: GNU/Linux Servers Top Survey, Linux Boots in 1 Second &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org/?p=104#comment-239</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux Buried in today’s news of Microsoft’s pricing scheme for their cloud service, aka Azures, is some amazing insight into their own IT infrastructure costs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux Buried in today’s news of Microsoft’s pricing scheme for their cloud service, aka Azures, is some amazing insight into their own IT infrastructure costs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux by Billy (seeds) 's status on Wednesday, 15-Jul-09 17:34:23 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy (seeds) 's status on Wednesday, 15-Jul-09 17:34:23 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org/?p=104#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/" rel="nofollow">http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux by ar-lock</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>ar-lock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org/?p=104#comment-236</guid>
		<description>disclaimer i&#039;m a *nix fan boy and have used ec2 extensively

How do these machines really compare? the 10c/h amazon machine has 1.7g or ram and a really slow processor.

also if you buy a year of service off Amazon its more like 4c an hour.

What does M$&#039;s offering boast?

This comparison has holes. 

As an aside giant companies can afford to lose money on new products for years, inorder to strangle out the competition, hard to draw any conclusions really.

Of course I know the ms is garbage beside *nix, but hey that&#039;s beside the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>disclaimer i&#8217;m a *nix fan boy and have used ec2 extensively</p>
<p>How do these machines really compare? the 10c/h amazon machine has 1.7g or ram and a really slow processor.</p>
<p>also if you buy a year of service off Amazon its more like 4c an hour.</p>
<p>What does M$&#8217;s offering boast?</p>
<p>This comparison has holes. </p>
<p>As an aside giant companies can afford to lose money on new products for years, inorder to strangle out the competition, hard to draw any conclusions really.</p>
<p>Of course I know the ms is garbage beside *nix, but hey that&#8217;s beside the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft admits: it costs less to run Linux by Adesuyan Bobby (bigbrovar) 's status on Wednesday, 15-Jul-09 16:55:13 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Adesuyan Bobby (bigbrovar) 's status on Wednesday, 15-Jul-09 16:55:13 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org/?p=104#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/" rel="nofollow">http://ophion.org/index.php/2009/07/microsoft-admits-it-costs-less-to-run-linux/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

