<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this really just a bad joke?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/</link>
	<description>Rafael Ferreira&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org:81/blog/?p=26#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Consider your source.  The NYTimes has a nice list of &quot;Most Popular&quot; articles that is nothing but a list of left-wing smears.  I have to assume you don&#039;t rely on a &quot;news&quot; source, much less the NYTimes for any real information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider your source.  The NYTimes has a nice list of &#8220;Most Popular&#8221; articles that is nothing but a list of left-wing smears.  I have to assume you don&#8217;t rely on a &#8220;news&#8221; source, much less the NYTimes for any real information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winfried</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Winfried</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org:81/blog/?p=26#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid that America will see another period of republican government, and I am also afraid that that government will launch another war (against Iran) before the next election.

I&#039;m European, but I&#039;ve lived in the US &#039;under&#039; Clinton and later for a short while &#039;under&#039; the Bush administration. The latter reminded me of an ugly Banana republic dictatorship, fueled by fear and cheap propaganda.

I won&#039;t say that things would significantly improve with Obama in the White House, but I think that at least they wouldn&#039;t get worse for America.

As for the &#039;news&#039; sources: People should be careful when they judge those &#039;real&#039; information. This &#039;real&#039; information depends heavily on who owns how many stocks of a publishing house and whether those stockholders have an agenda of their own. 

Usually political parties hold plenty of stock of relevant news and broadcasting enterprises, most of the time through holding companies which are owned by them, so their names won&#039;t appear immediately. This is also the case with private TV and radio stations, and it&#039;s the same in -any- country. And this is not a conspiracy theory, but a simple, verifiable fact.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that America will see another period of republican government, and I am also afraid that that government will launch another war (against Iran) before the next election.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m European, but I&#8217;ve lived in the US &#8216;under&#8217; Clinton and later for a short while &#8216;under&#8217; the Bush administration. The latter reminded me of an ugly Banana republic dictatorship, fueled by fear and cheap propaganda.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t say that things would significantly improve with Obama in the White House, but I think that at least they wouldn&#8217;t get worse for America.</p>
<p>As for the &#8216;news&#8217; sources: People should be careful when they judge those &#8216;real&#8217; information. This &#8216;real&#8217; information depends heavily on who owns how many stocks of a publishing house and whether those stockholders have an agenda of their own. </p>
<p>Usually political parties hold plenty of stock of relevant news and broadcasting enterprises, most of the time through holding companies which are owned by them, so their names won&#8217;t appear immediately. This is also the case with private TV and radio stations, and it&#8217;s the same in -any- country. And this is not a conspiracy theory, but a simple, verifiable fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raf</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org:81/blog/?p=26#comment-39</guid>
		<description>For the people that just discard the Times as a good source of information, I would like them to present me a reasonable option with a better (in terms of years) track record of investigative reporting. That doesn&#039;t mean that it is not flawed, everything is, but you need to make decisions on the margin. If I remember right, this is called Marginal Analysis in economics.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the people that just discard the Times as a good source of information, I would like them to present me a reasonable option with a better (in terms of years) track record of investigative reporting. That doesn&#8217;t mean that it is not flawed, everything is, but you need to make decisions on the margin. If I remember right, this is called Marginal Analysis in economics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://ophion.org/index.php/2008/09/is-this-really-just-a-bad-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ophion.org:81/blog/?p=26#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately there aren&#039;t a whole lot of &#039;good&#039; options for real, unbiased information as far as media outlets go.  They are no longer in the game for real news, they&#039;re in it for entertainment and sensationalism.  

Your best source in this case is the records of the people you are reading articles about.  What they&#039;ve done speaks quite a bit more loudly than what they say, or what the media reports that they say.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately there aren&#8217;t a whole lot of &#8216;good&#8217; options for real, unbiased information as far as media outlets go.  They are no longer in the game for real news, they&#8217;re in it for entertainment and sensationalism.  </p>
<p>Your best source in this case is the records of the people you are reading articles about.  What they&#8217;ve done speaks quite a bit more loudly than what they say, or what the media reports that they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

